When Nawaz Sharif, John Major and Bob Hawke played cricket in Harare

A look back to 30 years ago, when a handful of world leaders put on whites for charity

Masud Mahdi10-Nov-2020Unique, extraordinary, and surreal – clichéd, but truly the only accurate words to describe an event I was fortunate to witness: leaders from across the world meeting on the cricket pitch in Harare, Zimbabwe.(A disclaimer before I go on – the leaders mentioned in this article may evoke strong opinions among readers. This is not a political article, so please read it only in the spirit in which it is intended – a narration from an apolitical perspective.)My father, Rafat Mahdi, now a retired career diplomat, began his career in 1970, and in January 1990 he took on his first ambassadorial assignment as Pakistan’s high commissioner to Zimbabwe. In the middle of 1991, and his team started preparations for a visit by a Pakistan delegation, led by the prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, to attend a Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in October in Harare.The commonwealth is an organisation mainly of former colonies and territories of the British empire. As such, cricket is popular in many commonwealth countries. Sharif, a huge cricket enthusiast and an established club player, sent a peculiar request to a few months before the summit. He wanted my father to organise a cricket match with other world leaders attending the summit. As if the stress of managing a prime minister’s visit was not enough! gauged interest from other commonwealth ambassadors stationed in Harare. There was strong interest from prime ministers John Major (UK), Bob Hawke (Australia) and Maumoon Abdul Gayoom (Maldives) to take part. India would not participate, not for political reasons, but because their prime minister, Narasimha Rao, was skipping the retreat portion of the summit at Victoria Falls. found a strong partner in Mark Williams of the British High Commission in organising the event, and received logistical support from various officials in the Zimbabwe government and the Zimbabwe Cricket Union.Bob Hawke and John Major walk out to bat. Mark Williams of the British High Commission in Harare is right behind them•Masud MahdiThe world leaders were paired: Hawke and Major, Gayoom and Sharif. Each pair would bat for three overs. After the world leaders had played their innings, some famous cricketing names would continue the entertainment, including West Indies legend Clive Lloyd, Zimbabwe’s Dave Houghton, and Zimbabwe-born Graeme Hick, who had qualified and debuted for England earlier that year. Prince Edward School, where the likes of Duncan Fletcher, Hick, Houghton and Eddo Brandes were educated, was chosen over multiple contenders including my school, St John’s College, as the bowling team.The event was confirmed for the afternoon of Friday, October the 18th, and announced to the public. Outlets began hyping the event, adults and schoolchildren alike excitedly talked about it, and sponsors threw in their support for charitable purposes – each six was a Z$1000 donation, and each four a Z$500 donation (keep in mind, this was when US$ 1 was exchanged for around Z$ 4).The CHOGM began the week of October 14. As with any large gathering of world leaders, the week was packed with various events focused on global events, relationships and initiatives. The Friday afternoon match was on a tight schedule because all the leaders were flying in the evening to Victoria Falls.For Sharif, the afternoon began with the Friday prayer at a mosque. From the mosque, he, my father, and the delegation headed to the Pakistan High Commission to meet the officers and staff there. My brother, Asad, and I excitedly hitched a ride in the motorcade as well. After this meeting, Sharif changed into his cricket kit and we all headed to the Harare Sports Club.It was a typical Harare early summer afternoon. The full crowd at the Harare Sports Club was giddy in anticipation. When the motorcade arrived at the venue, led Sharif to the enclosure for dignitaries where the other leaders were waiting. Sharif, though, had other plans. “I need some net practice,” he said. So off we went to the nets!Nawaz Sharif pads up for practice. Behind him (wearing white) is Rafat Mahdi•Masud MahdiThe nets were open to all to watch. A crowd of attendees left their seats to watch Sharif warm up for the main event. After a few of Sharif’s staff took their turn at bowling, my father handed a ball to me. I was definitely not known for my bowling skills (and neither really for batting or fielding), and naturally I was very nervous, given the situation. I threw a beamer straight at Sharif’s head. It was one of the most agonising split seconds of my life. Thankfully Sharif was able to use his skill to comfortably defend it. That was a huge relief for me and for , who politely asked me not to bowl any further.I saw a couple of my school friends and handed them the ball. Random members of the crowd also bowled. Sharif impressed in the nets. My brother was the only one who managed to bowl him out, with a ripper that went around his legs. Word soon came that Major, Hawke and Gayoom were ready to get the show started. Among other political dignitaries in attendance were Zimbabwe president Robert Mugabe and Bangladesh prime minister Khaleda Zia.Before I go further, a moment of reflection to capture how surreal the event was. There were no security checks that day. No barricades, no metal detectors, no bag checks, nothing. There was some crowd control where the dignitaries were seated, but people could still move around with ease. Case in point, I wandered into the area and ended up, not out of choice, sitting between Mugabe and Zia for a portion of the match.Back to the main event. Major and Hawke walked towards the pitch amid tremendous applause. The Prince Edward bowlers were instructed to bowl dollies to ensure entertainment. I cannot recall ball by ball what happened, but at least a couple of fours were hit in those three overs. They also managed a few twos and some singles, and neither was dismissed. The crowd applauded them back into the pavilion when their three overs were up.Sharif and Gayoom walked out to even greater applause, as the substantial Pakistani community in attendance cheered for their representative. Sharif confided to before walking in that he was nervous about the first ball. tried to calm him down, and encouraged him to unremarkably defend it, after which he would gain his confidence. Defend the first ball is exactly what Sharif did, a good omen.John Major and Robert Mugabe at the presentation while Nawaz Sharif and Shaharyar Khan, both padded up, look on•Masud MahdiA few balls later, he made great use of his feet, charging down the pitch and launching the ball over the boundary for a huge six, throwing the crowd into a frenzy. A couple of fours soon followed, then another six, and another a few balls later. No one expected this level of entertainment, and it was pure exhilaration for a responsive and supportive crowd. For good measure, there were some singles and doubles too, and Gayoom gave able support for whatever little of the strike he had. The pair walked back in after their three overs to a raucous ovation.There was a presentation ceremony – I do not recall whether it was before the cricket started or after – recognising the participation of the world leaders, thanking the organisers and the sponsors, and reflecting on the purpose of the event. Hands were shaken, pleasantries exchanged, and the leaders headed off to the airport.The on-pitch festivities continued into the evening. Hick walked in and subjected the bowlers – now bowling at full strength – to an endless barrage of fours and sixes. Lloyd, Houghton and others also batted, as well as Pakistani diplomat Shaharyar Khan, who later became the head of the PCB. The participants entertained, the crowd enjoyed themselves, and money was raised for charity.Coverage of the event was, unfortunately, somewhat limited. Pakistan Television (PTV) did capture footage and broadcast it on the news in Pakistan. There must certainly be a VHS tape in some PTV storage room with extended footage. What I have with me from the event are a few photos – memories of that joyous Harare afternoon etched in my mind. And a hope, perhaps too optimistic, that we will see a repeat one day.Want to be featured in Inbox? Send your articles to us here, with “Inbox” in the subject line.

Nicholas Pooran: 'West Indies' T20I ranking doesn't show how good our team actually is'

Pooran talks bio-bubbles, his personal aspirations for 2021, and why he opted out of Bangladesh tour

Sreshth Shah06-Jan-2021There’s a perception that West Indies cricketers have saved international and franchise cricket in 2020. But that comes with bubble life and plenty of sacrifices on a personal level. One can say you’re one of the experts of this new life that cricketers must lead. How has it been?
First of all, the bubble life is extremely difficult, to be honest. I am currently in my fifth month in a row hopping from bubble to bubble. It’s especially difficult being away from friends and family. As a cricketer, you appreciate the bubble because your focus is all about the game, how to get better, but if you’re not performing as a sportsperson and in the bubble, then you need to get out, have a drink, have a laugh, catch up with others. There are positives and negatives of being in the bubble.I learnt a lot about myself because in the last six-seven months, I wasn’t too sure if we’d play cricket again in 2020. And here I am five months after in 2021, five months in the bubble, and I am just trying to appreciate every single match. Eight months ago, I really wasn’t sure when I’d play cricket again. And now I am looking to just take advantage of these moments and looking to enjoy playing as if it’s my last game.How do you spend time alone, in your own company? Is there anything new you’ve discovered about yourself?
I’ve just been reading books. I’m reading a lot, trying my best to get better not only in cricket but other aspects of life … like my intellect. There’s not much else you can do. My focus at the moment is to get better at the game, so I’ll spend a lot of time on my iPad looking at videos, doing homework on my game, looking at other batsmen, what they do to be successful, watch interviews. That’s the most, I think, I can do.Why did you, in particular, opt out of the Bangladesh ODIs set to start mid-January? Was it because of the burnout, the bio-bubbles or something else?
It’s not at all about pulling the plug on cricket or wanting a break, but about the health factor in Bangladesh. As a player, I wasn’t sure, was a bit sceptical of the health situation there. Because other players weren’t going either, I felt I didn’t have to take the risk and Cricket West Indies were understanding and gave the players the benefit of the doubt. What I’ll be doing when West Indies play the ODIs is not be involved in any other cricket. I’ll be watching the ODI series from home.Related

  • Kumar Sangakkara: 'T10 a format that might be pushed forward' to get cricket into Olympics

  • Ten West Indies players pull out of Bangladesh tour

  • Pooran, Pollard in ESPNcricinfo's T20 team of the year

Who are you excited to watch in those Bangladesh ODIs, given so many withdrawals allow some new faces to have a crack at international cricket?I have a couple of names. Kyle Mayers, Kjorn Ottley, Akeal Hosein and even Jason Mohammed. These are guys that can do really good. Looking forward to seeing them tackle this challenge in Bangladesh. Bangladesh plays very well at home, but these guys are good enough and it’s a great opportunity for them, which they should look to grab.The T20 World Cup is scheduled later this year in India. What are your – and West Indies’ – aspirations for that event?Personally, I am looking forward to the T20 World Cup. As a team, our strength is T20s. For the last couple of years, we’ve been doing good in World Cups, but as a team where we are ranked [10th], it doesn’t show how good our team actually is. Most of the senior guys are coming back to the West Indies team … like Kieron Pollard, Dwayne Bravo, Andre Russell and Sunil Narine are all coming back eventually. As a player, I am especially excited because I want to do good for the West Indies people and put a smile on their faces. My record for West Indies in T20s isn’t that good and I want to improve that for the next couple of months.Can you pinpoint why the rankings aren’t reflective of how good, as you just said, West Indies cricket is?I just believe that most of the series West Indies play, they don’t play with their strongest team. And by strongest I mean Chris Gayle, Pollard, Russell, Narine, Bravo in the team together. In the last couple of years, we haven’t witnessed these players together. Either most of them weren’t selected, some were unavailable … but definitely a case around that. We couldn’t play as a team after the last T20 World Cup. This, I am saying from a player’s and a fan’s point of view. Not seeing some of my favourite players represent West Indies might be one of the reasons.You were one of the breakout stars of the T10 format, top-scoring in the Abu Dhabi T10 League in 2018 even, and this season will be captain at Northern Warriors. When it comes to batting in T10 cricket, does the tradition role of a ‘top-order’ or ‘middle-order batsman’ exist? Or are all the batsmen – from Nos. 1 to 7 – simply … ‘batsmen.’No, I feel there are different roles. If you lose your openers in the first or second over, then the middle order needs to come into play. I wouldn’t expect them to come out and take risks that are not required, and yes, it’s only 10 overs, and your strike-rate needs to be in the 150s or 160s, but if you keep going hard at the bowlers, then there’s a chance of losing a lot of wickets.So it’s just like 50 overs or T20s, you need to rebuild, but in this case you can rebuild only for one or two overs, so I do feel there’s a middle order and it’s very important to a team’s success in T10. Especially when you play in bigger grounds.Nicholas Pooran finished IPL 2020 with a strike-rate of 169•BCCISpending so much time in the UAE for the IPL, then, will be very helpful as you approach the T10 tournament?The first two years of the T10 was – in Sharjah – everyone had high strike-rates. In a small ground like that, even edges went for six, but in Abu Dhabi – where we will be playing now – you can’t come out and play a big shot and hope it goes for six. It’s difficult. So you need to get yourself in as well in T10, more so in Abu Dhabi because of the ground sizes.After this IPL, we saw that the new ball is especially effective in Abu Dhabi. If you’re going to get wickets, you will get it with the new ball. The ground is obviously bigger so you need to hit the gaps, try to run your twos. If you mistime your ball, you will get out, which doesn’t happen in smaller grounds like Sharjah.It’s also the first time you’ll be captaining a franchise. There’s a theory that certain players fare better when they aren’t burdened with captaincy while certain players thrive under the extra responsibility. Where do you stand on that debate when it comes to you?First I consider myself as a player in a team. And in franchise cricket, a lot of decisions, like choosing a captain is about trust and communication. I can’t say if I’ll be a captain of other franchises, but if they see me fit that I am ready to lead whatever team … it’s no problem.I always see myself as a leader on and off the field. If things aren’t working out and I have to make a decision where leadership is not for me, I’ll own up and take that decision. But for now it’s a challenge I am always willing to accept.As a globetrotting cricketer, I’m sure you can discuss batting with many great players. But do you discuss tactics with people too? Who is your go-to person to discuss cricket beyond just batting?I am very close to Pollard. I think he is one of the best T20 players in the world. He has played the most T20 games, so I discuss tactics with him. I try to model my game around him. I discuss field settings, bowling options, bowling changes, where bowlers should bowl to certain batsmen according to the game’s situation. I also have played enough T20 cricket to understand what is required at a particular stage of the game.

T Natarajan and Washington Sundar: a tale of friendship and freakish Test debuts

Both faced hardships and injuries along the way, but emerged as heroes at Australia’s fortress

Deivarayan Muthu22-Jan-2021India Test cap No. 300: T Natarajan (Age 29)
India Test cap No. 301: Washington Sundar (Age 21)
Growing up, they were separated by age and by physical distance. But over the years, the careers of left-arm seamer Natarajan and allrounder Washington intersected several times – so much so that they became good friends. And then a freakish chain of circumstances saw them make their Test debuts, improbably, in India’s historic win at the Gabba.The early years
When Washington was a kid, he and his elder sister Shailaja, who has played for Tamil Nadu women, would hop into their dad M Sundar’s scooter to play cricket at the Marina Beach in Chennai. Sundar, a former Tamil Nadu prospect and long-time coach, then trained Washington and Shailaja at the Chepauk ‘B’ ground, with Washington seamlessly ticking off several boxes along the way: Chennai first-division league, age-group cricket for Tamil Nadu, and Under-19 cricket for India.

****

As for Natarajan, who grew up in Chinnappampatti, a village about 370kms away from Chennai, cricket was escapism from poverty. You might be familiar with his backstory by now.Natarajan and his protégé G Periyaswamy, who is playing for Tamil Nadu in the ongoing Syed Mushtaq Ali T20 tournament, would hop into share autos to the neighbouring towns and villages, yorking oppositions.Natarajan soon became a tennis-ball star in Salem, as did Periyaswamy, but Natarajan didn’t play red-ball cricket until 2010 or thereabouts. He hadn’t even heard about league cricket in Chennai until his tennis-ball cricket team-mate and now godfather Jayaprakash helped him get a gig with the BSNL fourth-division team there.Related

The miracle man of Chinnappampatti

T Natarajan: 'If I make an error, I back myself to come back with the yorker'

Doubts over Natarajan's availability for England T20Is

India created the greatest moment in their Test history

Gabba result has done justice to the game we love

TNPL 2016
By 2016, Natarajan had risen through the ranks in Chennai like Washington, although belatedly. In the 13th match of the inaugural season of the Tamil Nadu Premier League (TNPL), a nerveless Natarajan delivered six yorkers back-to-back in a Super Over, turning the heads of the IPL scouts. Guess who was one of the batsmen facing him? Washington kept out two of those yorkers, including the last ball.However, as the tournament progressed, Washington seized his other chances – both with ball and bat – himself attracting the attention of the IPL scouts.Washington Sundar made his India debut in 2017, the same year in which he was picked by the Rising Pune Supergiants in the IPL•Getty ImagesIPL 2017
Stephen Fleming, the then Rising Pune Supergiants’ coach, liked what he’d seen of Natarajan, and the franchise made the opening bid for the left-armer at the 2017 auction. The Supergiants’ management tussled with the Kings XI Punjab until the bid was escalated to nearly INR 1 crore (approx. US $136,936) from the base price of INR 10 lakh (approx. US $13,693). As it turned out, the Kings XI went all out for Natarajan and scooped him up for INR 3 crore (approx. US $410,809).The Supergiants didn’t get Natarajan, but they got Washington as a replacement player after R Ashwin had suffered an injury. Washington fronted up to take the new ball in the powerplay and helped them to within touching distance of winning the IPL title.As for Natarajan, he had a tougher initiation into the IPL and was perhaps weighed down by the price-tag pressure. He struggled to nail his yorkers like he had in the TNPL and tennis-ball cricket. The IPL jackpot, however, enabled him to realise his dream of establishing his own cricket academy in Chinnappampatti. Washington was among the chief guests Natarajan had invited to launch his academy after IPL 2017, but seemingly he couldn’t make it in the end.Battling injuries
Washington made his ODI and T20I debuts for India in 2017, while Natarajan returned to domestic cricket. Injuries didn’t help Natarajan either, with an elbow complaint forcing surgery in November 2017. It was around this time that Natarajan placed greater focus on his fitness. He went on a meat-heavy diet, bulked up and came back to become Tamil Nadu’s lead seamer.

****

On India’s tour to the UK in 2018, Washington suffered a freak injury while playing football. He had hurt multiple ligaments in his ankle, and although he didn’t need surgery, he was bed-ridden for several weeks. He then underwent rehab at the National Cricket Academy (NCA) in Bengaluru and eased his way back into the state side, before returning to the national reckoning.T Natarajan emerged as IPL 2020’s yorker specialist, enjoying a breakout season in the UAE•BCCIIPL 2020
Natarajan was picked by the Sunrisers Hyderabad for INR 40 lakh (approx. US $54,774) in the IPL 2018 auction, but didn’t get a single game in that season as well as the following one. Washington, in contrast, got more game-time at the Royal Challengers Bangalore in IPL 2018 and 2019, but couldn’t quite replicate his 2017 performances at the Supergiants.Both Natarajan and Washington, however, enjoyed their breakout IPL seasons in 2020 in the UAE. While Natarajan emerged as the league’s new yorker specialist, Washington re-emerged as the new-ball powerplay expert.Natarajan unites with Washington in the India team
Washington was subsequently selected in India’s T20I squad for the Australia tour, with Natarajan, who was originally picked as a net bowler for that tour, joining his good friend in the T20I side after an injury to Varun Chakravarthy. For the first time ever, Natarajan and Washington were in the India team together, with Washington even reeling off a song from Rajinikanth’s blockbuster Tamil movie on social media, to celebrate Natarajan’s call-up #friendshipgoals.

From net bowlers to Test debutants to match-winners
Hours before the start of the ODI series in Australia, Natarajan was added to the ODI squad too as injury cover and later even made his international debut in the third match in Canberra. Washington wasn’t part of the ODI squad, but you could spot him in the huddle during Natarajan’s maiden cap-presentation ceremony, cheering his friend.Washington Sundar and T Natarajan: similar journeys before Test debutants together•ESPNcricinfo LtdIn the subsequent T20I series, Natarajan showed that there’s more to him than the yorker while Washington did his thing in the powerplay, as the pair helped India to a 2-1 series triumph.Through a chain of unprecedented circumstances and injuries to several frontline bowlers – including Mohammed Shami, Umesh Yadav and Ashwin – Natarajan and Washington then made their Test debuts together when the series was on the line in Brisbane.Both Washington and Natarajan were merely picked as net bowlers for the red-ball leg, but they showed they belong to the biggest stage, coming away with three wickets each in the first innings.

Washington snaffled his former Supergiants captain Steven Smith down the leg side for his maiden Test wicket and was then part of another thread that connected him with Natarajan. After Marnus Labuschagne pulled Natarajan to deep midwicket in the 66th over, Washington fumbled there, allowing a second where there could’ve just been a single. The next ball was a dot and coincidentally the subsequent one resulted in Natarajan finding Labuschange’s top edge.Washington torched the Gabba with the bat too, pulling off an outrageous no-look six off Nathan Lyon and topped it with a hooked six off Pat Cummins in the chase. Just like that, the two debutants helped India to a series victory for the ages.

Mignon du Preez: 'In India, I made sure to try out different curries, but it has to be mild'

The South Africa batter on the importance of the occasional cheat meal, and her love of braai

Interview by Annesha Ghosh19-Mar-2021What do you like eating most in any given week?
. That’s probably because I’m South African, we all like to eat braai. Around the world, braai is known more as barbecue. I am a big meat-eater, so if I can have meat during my meal, I’m always happy and it puts a smile on my face.Of all the venues you’ve played in to date, where did you find the food most delicious?
During the 2017 ODI World Cup [in England], Leicester County Cricket Club served us delicious food. At the Lalbhai Contractor Stadium in Surat, where we played in 2019, I loved the Indian delicacies.As far as cooking goes, what would be your claim to fame?
I think my husband would say cannelloni. That’s one of his favourites and I enjoy making cannelloni. And if I am pressed for time I go for something Mexican, like a fajita or a burrito bowl. It’s quick, easy, and delicious.Are you the best cook in the family?
No (). I’ve been on tour so often and been playing cricket most of the time, I am grateful that my mom did most of the cooking. It was only after I got married that I realised, “Whoopsie! Mom’s not around, so I’ve got to step up.” I’ve got a few go-to meals, but every time I get back, I feel like I’ve forgotten everything. I don’t remember how to make the food! So we just then have to make a braai and I stick to a side salad, which is pretty easy.If you could pick one team-mate to cook meals for you for one year straight, who would that be?
I’d go for a WBBL team-mate, in the Melbourne Stars family: Holly Ferling. She’s made some really good food for us on tour and she’s extremely good at baking. I have got a sweet tooth, so if I’ve got to be stuck with a team-mate for 365 days, she’ll spoil me.What sort of fast food is allowed in the South Africa women’s team?
The biggest thing about fast food is [that it] is processed. You can try to stay away from processed food and instead eat real ingredients when it’s freshly made. In South Africa and elsewhere we’ve got Nando’s, which is a really healthy option. You can get good flame-grilled chicken.That being said, I do feel every now and then you’ve got to spoil yourself, just be human, and have that occasional cheat meal. I’m big on treating myself. For me, it could be a pizza or a pasta. The point is just don’t overdo it or do it too often.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Mignon du Preez (@mdpminx22)

South Africa will host the 2023 Women’s T20 World Cup. What is the one local dish you would like for Cricket South Africa to put on the menu for all visiting teams?
I would go for two options. The – it’s a South African delicacy similar to a stew. It has meats and vegetables and other ingredients. We make it in a big black pot and the dish is more about the social aspect of eating because the pot is surrounded by people and we do it at nice events, like, when we watch rugby. You start the pot early. It takes about three-four hours, so it’s a big social gathering.The other one I’d go for is . It’s essentially milk and eggs and minced meat – it’s something really you need to try. It’s very sweet. As for the dessert, I’d suggest either the milk tart or the peppermint crisp tart.During overseas tours, do you stick to a specific kind of meal?
I like to mix it up a little bit. In pre-match meals, I probably have to look for a bit more brain food, eat something like a nice pasta. For me to perform, I am a big meat-eater, so I try and make sure I get in some sort of meat in my meals. Also, travelling as a cricketer gives you the opportunity to experience the cuisine and cultures of other nations, so when we were, say, in India, I made sure to try out different curries. But it has to be mild () – I can’t do anything too hot and spicy. Variety is the spice of life, so it’s good to get accustomed to whatever people in the other host nations eat, to try different things.Have you had to remove certain foods from your diet due to professional reasons?
As I mentioned earlier, I’ve got a sweet tooth, so for me it’s about trying to limit the intake of treats. I’m big on chocolates and desserts. In terms of keeping fit and healthy, we’ve got a few requirements, so I’ve got to make sure I reduce the intake, but I wouldn’t say I cut it out completely.What’s your favourite post-workout snack?
I like to have a chocolate steri stumpie. In South Africa, it’s basically like drinking chocolate milk. There’s no fat. When it’s really cold, it’s nice and refreshing. Milk is good for you post-workout, so we enjoy that. If I have to look at a smoothie, I’d say I enjoy a peanut butter and frozen blueberry smoothie. That’s my go-to option.

Talking Points: What makes de Villiers the best at the death?

What’s changed for Maxwell, and are the Knight Riders wasting Shakib?

Alagappan Muthu18-Apr-20212:38

Brendon McCullum – We should have bowled Chakravarthy against Maxwell

What makes de Villiers a great death-overs batterThere are over 200 players who have faced more than 30 death-overs deliveries over their IPL careers. AB de Villiers stands above all of them. The undisputed No. 1. The phenom. The punisher more than just a finisher with a strike rate of 233.97.How does he do it? How does he come in at the 12th over of a T20 and hit an unbeaten 76? How does he come in at the 39th over of an ODI and score a hundred?Well, for one, there’s his balance. After a shuffle across his stumps and a crouch, he is perfectly still until the ball comes down, which opens up every part of the ground.Second, he tries not to premeditate. Sure, he walks across his crease when he scoops and everything, but for the most part, he just reacts to the ball.”I follow my instincts,” de Villiers said in 2016 after leading a badly, laughably crumbling Royal Challengers into the IPL final. “I try and watch the ball closely. I’ve played the game for many years now and I know my talent will take over if I just watch the ball and enjoy myself out there.”For proof of those words, take a look at ball number 17.5 from the Royal Challengers innings today. It’s from Andre Russell. So it’s quick. He’s also coming around the wicket, so it’s cramping him for room. Plus, there’s the added complication of it being a high full-toss.But de Villiers’ instincts have already kicked in. They tell him to just get low. And to bend to the leg side so he would have room to thrust his hands up from under the ball. And just like that, he conjures a boundary out of nowhere.Instinct. And de Villiers’ is still the best.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhat’s changed for Maxwell?On a pitch where it has never looked easy to time the ball. Glenn Maxwell at one point was 60 off 34. That’s a strike rate of 176.47Royal Challengers bought him with the intention of making him one of their key players. They gave him the No. 4 spot – even if it meant fewer deliveries for de Villiers, arguably their biggest match-winner. He has slotted into the leadership group as well, often seen in discussions with Kohli on the field.All of this is exactly how he plays for Australia. They bat him high up the order. They give him extra responsibility. They get the best out of him.In T20Is, Maxwell has batted at No. 5 or lower in only 19 of his 65 innings. That’s about 29%.In the IPL, he’s been forced to bat at No. 5 or lower in 31 of his 82 innings. That’s 37%.The finisher hype had messed him up in previous seasons of this tournament. Now he’s been given time to shape a whole T20 innings and he’s risen to the challenge. Big time.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhy is Chakravarthy dangerous?A man who taught himself to bowl by watching Sunil Narine videos on YouTube is now keeping Sunil Narine out. How about that?Varun Chakravarthy may well be the Knight Riders’ most important bowler this IPL for two simple reasons: he turns the ball both ways and is hard to read out of the hand.Kohli couldn’t read him. Went for a big shot – aiming for long-on – and was caught at cover instead.Rajat Patidar couldn’t read him. He was too late on a ball that broke his stumps.Even de Villiers didn’t dare attempt anything flash. The Knight Riders wanted to save Chakravarthy for the Royal Challengers talisman. So they took him out of the attack after a double-wicket first over and brought him back on as soon as de Villiers came to the crease.The battle lasted seven balls. Except it could have easily ended in the fifth, with Chakravarthy getting de Villiers’ outside edge, but there was no slip in place.Can India make the most of his talent in what is a T20 World Cup year?Varun Chakravarthy landed two early blows or KKR against RCB•BCCI/IPLAre Knight Riders wasting Shakib?Shakib Al Hasan’s subtle variations in pace and length have led to the downfall of many. And each of them will have wondered “what just happened – I thought I had him!” Left-arm orthodox has never been so funky.But Shakib is a fine batter too. At the 2019 World Cup, having demanded the No. 3 position for Bangladesh, he scored 606 runs at an average of 87 and a strike rate of 96. A top-order slot with time to get into his groove is the best way to maximise on his batting potential but the Knight Riders are a bit too packed up there.Shubman Gill can’t bat anywhere else. Nitish Rana has earned the chance for a longer rope. And Rahul Tripathi is high-impact in the powerplay. Then captain Eoin Morgan wants the No. 4 spot – that’s his in the England team as well. So Shakib is, well, a bit stuck.

Sam Hain packs away risk-averse persona in hope of encouraging England gamble

Birmingham batter has increased his strike rate and his average while batting in one of the toughest spots in the team

Cameron Ponsonby24-Jun-2021In one of the more inspirational songs of the 20th century, Bananarama and The Fun Boy Three posited that it wasn’t in fact what you did that mattered, but the way that you did it.Sam Hain knows this feeling all too well. Weight of runs has never been an issue for Hain, but the rate at which they have been scored has. A strike rate in the low 120s saw him go undrafted for the Hundred in successive years and left a man who many believe to be the best uncapped white-ball player in the country “soul-searching” as to what to do next.Related

  • Pollock, Hain and Brathwaite fire Bears past Notts in high-scorer

  • All Rhodes lead to quarter-finals as Bears' perfect start continues

  • 'Being unpredictable is a big thing in T20' – Jake Lintott

The answer was simple in its conclusion if complex in its process: just go out there and whack it.The results are clear to see in the numbers. In the last three editions of the Blast, Hain’s strike rate has risen from 118.60 in 2019, to 139.21 in 2020 and now 147.42 in 2021. Similarly, his average has gone from 41.72 to 56.80 to 71.50. He’s scoring more runs, faster. Bananarama would approve.But surely just deciding to whack it can’t bring about change like this? It certainly feels like it shouldn’t. However, that’s to underestimate the power of will required to leave behind a mindset that has taken you to within touching distance of the pinnacle of your profession and adopt a new one entirely.Hain describes himself as quite a risk-averse person. As a cricketer, it’s a personality trait that has seen him become the Bears’ go-to man for years. Know your strengths as much as your weaknesses, win the ball in front of you, put the game on your back and carry the team home. However, Hundred franchises and England didn’t need responsibility, they needed runs, quickly.Over time and through conversations with the Warwickshire coaching staff, Hain began to reassess his interpretation of risk.”You’ve got to flip it on its head,” he says. “What makes me, me, is that I play the game of percentages. So what I’ve been trying to do is take the riskier options earlier and know that if it doesn’t work and I do get out, I’m only going to learn from that and that’s how I’m going to get better.”As a risk-averse person, Hain realised that the greatest risk confronting him was to not take any at all. Staying in his shell risked a potential England career, whereas coming out of it merely risked his wicket.As a motto for life, it’s poignant if cliched. However, in cricketing terms, it’s not a strategy that would work for everyone; Hain is already very good at cricket and his new mindset has only served to unleash his ability.”Technically, there’s honestly not much I’ve changed,” he says. “I feel like I’ve got most of the shots and I’m pretty 360 [degrees]. I truly believe I can play all around the ground and it was just the confidence to do so that was lacking.”Another thing of note with Hain’s success is the position in which he’s been scoring his runs: No. 4. Four is the worst place to bat in T20 cricket. Hain himself admitted to some hesitancy when he was first given the role last season saying, “it’s quite a tricky position”. If you come in during the Powerplay it means you’ve lost two early wickets, whereas if you come in just after the Powerplay you’re likely facing the opposition’s best spinner. Any later than that and you’re expected to tee off from ball one. It requires immense versatility and a player’s strike rate often suffers as a result, a metric that matters more for Hain than most.However, it is working with the Bears. And given the success he has found in the role, Hain insists that he “definitely wouldn’t change at the moment”, and that he doesn’t crave a return to the top of the order for Birmingham any time soon. Although he does say it in the same way you tell your girlfriend’s family that you’re happy with any takeaway when in reality you want the duck pancakes and to open the batting.In two years, Hain’s T20 game has transitioned from being the thorn in his career to bringing him into strong contention as one of the Hundred’s wildcard picks for this summer’s tournament. And whilst it remains to be seen if it’s enough to force his way into England’s white-ball teams, he remains, as ever, the Bears go-to man. Still getting the job done, just that bit more quickly.

ICC CEO: 'We need to provide a WTC pathway to all 12 Test teams'

Geoff Allardice talks about the future of the ICC’s big events: the WTC, the World Cups and the Champions Trophy

Interview by Nagraj Gollapudi 18-Jun-20213:44

Geoff Allardice: ‘Our preference would be to have a T20 World Cup with crowds’

When he took charge as the ICC chairman last year, Greg Barclay said the World Test Championship might go back to the drawing board. You must be happy the ICC board recently agreed to retain the WTC as is for the next eight-year cycle?
Yes, we are. The finish to the World Test Championship, not just [from] a fan interest point of view, but even the players were engaged, [wondering] are we not qualifying or what do we have to do to qualify. That’s the sort of result we were after when the World Test Championship was created.In terms of the future, in our preliminary discussions with the Full Members around the Future Tours Programme [FTP] beyond 2023, there was universal acceptance that the World Test Championship should continue. The same assumptions around a two-year cycle and a final at the end of it have been supported by the Full Members. That’s been really positive.I know that midway through the cycle, with Covid rampant in so many countries, there was a lot of uncertainty around the cricket schedule and the future of the Test Championship. But we have seen the fruits of why it was created in the last few months. And, certainly, the [thinking] among the members is that it should continue.Related

ICC mulls regular Test matches for non-WTC Full Members

Whatever happened to the Intercontinental Cup?

WTC winners to take home USD 1.6 million

ICC CEO: 'Back-up plans' in place if India cannot host T20 World Cup

ICC CEO: All Test matches to carry same points weightage in WTC

Will it continue in the same format – top nine Test teams playing six series each on a home-and-away basis?
This [second WTC] cycle [2021-23] is locked in and it’s the same format – nine teams and six series [each, over that period]. The fixtures were finalised in 2018. We are now looking at the cricket calendar beyond 2023 and the structure of the World Test Championship. We’ve got other Test-playing countries who are keen to be involved, but on the other hand, the number of series you can fit in a two-year period is probably not going to increase.The calendar is congested and some countries have introduced new T20 leagues, which takes their national team out of action for a period of time. Realistically, six series is going to be the number a team will play. How many teams in the competition is still being considered amongst the members.Afghanistan, Ireland and Zimbabwe will be hungry to prove their mettle. Is revisiting the two-tier model an option?
We had that discussion back in in 2016 or 2017. And it [the two-tier model] didn’t have support then. The most important thing is that we provide a pathway for all the Test teams. There’s nine in the Test Championship at the moment, and there’s three more who want their Test matches to have context. How that translates into competition structures is something we’re still working through.

“In our preliminary discussions with the Full Members about the FTP beyond 2023, there was universal acceptance that the World Test Championship should continue”

How do you help these three countries who want to play more Test cricket?
There’s a couple of issues. One is that the volume of Test matches per year that’s needed to be part of the World Test Championship in its current structure is six Test matches [per year], home or away. Up until now none of those three countries are playing that volume of Test cricket. So how do you get them up to a point where they are playing that volume and [have] the potential to be involved in a league in the future? They are obviously playing among themselves: Zimbabwe and Afghanistan played two Test matches recently in Abu Dhabi. You’ve got Zimbabwe having just played Pakistan [at home] as well. They have also got finite resources.They have an opportunity to qualify for World Cups and there’s expanded tournaments in the next cycle, too. They have to decide which formats they prioritise as well. Whether they play the volume of Test cricket needed to be part of the championship is one of the things we’ll be keeping an eye on over this [2021-23] cycle.Are there plans to bring back the Intercontinental Cup?
The recent decisions to expand the ODI and T20 World Cups for men and women is likely to see the focus being on developing more competitive Associate member teams in those two formats rather than the four-day format.R Ashwin suggested that to provide more context to the WTC, the series within it could perhaps be played at neutral venues. What is the primary challenge there?
The beauty of bilateral cricket is that it’s designed to satisfy the desires of cricket fans in each country. Generally, they want to watch their national team playing. Probably all of us are seduced by cricket when you are watching your heroes play, and your heroes are generally your national team players. That would be missing if you were to play the World Test Championship at neutral venues. That’s why having the same number of series home and way is important. I don’t think that the opportunity to play in front of home crowds is something the members would consider giving up.Geoff Allardice: “The only reason the Champions Trophy was discontinued between 2019 and 2023 was to create the opportunity for a T20 World Cup every two years”•Christiaan Kotze/Getty ImagesAnother factor that plays a role in bilateral series is the type of the ball used. In the WTC there are three types of balls being used across regions. Some people ask, why not have one ball, for a level-playing field.
One of the things we have always looked at over the years is, we don’t try to standardise pitches in each country, and we don’t dictate which balls members use for their conditions. When we were considering the arrangements for the final, the decision was that we would use the ball used for Test cricket in the country hosting the final. Once the final was in the UK, it was going to be a Dukes ball regardless of who was playing.Can you expand on the percentage points system that will be used to rank teams going forward in the next cycle of the WTC?
The next cycle of the WTC, starting with England vs India in August, will see a change to the points system. Instead of each series being worth the same number of points, 120, irrespective of whether the series is played over two Tests or five Tests, the next cycle will see each match being worth the same number of points – a maximum of 12 per match. Teams will be ranked on the percentage of available points they won from the matches they have played. The aim was to try and simplify the points system and to allow teams to be meaningfully compared on the table at any point, though they may have played differing numbers of matches and series.Recently the ICC board decided to expand the men’s ODI World Cup back to 14 teams and to increase the T20 World Cup to 20 teams. How are you looking to balance expansion and commercial interests? A high number of mismatches was among the reasons why the ICC decided it limit the ODI World Cup to ten teams after the 2015 edition.
That’s been one of the discussions over the last few months. Do you structure the events to grow the sport and provide opportunity for your member countries to compete in the flagship tournaments? Or are they primarily an opportunity to drive finances? They are always going to be both, but the view of our members – and it was quite a strong view across both the Chief Executives Committee and the [ICC] board – was that we were looking to expand our ODI World Cup and the T20 World Cup as well.Over the last couple of years, the changes around the structure for T20 cricket have been quite significant: in terms of giving all the countries T20I status for the men’s and women’s national teams; to have a global ranking system for men’s and women’s T20I teams; to have a T20 World Cup every two years for all of our members to aspire to; and to have a qualification pathway that makes participation in the major events achievable.

“Realistically, six series is going to be the number a team will play over the two-year WTC cycle”

So in the future, it might be only two steps, at worse three, for any country to get into a T20 World Cup. Those changes around expanding are very much looking to the future of the game and trying to create incentives in the pathway that drives competition.The board also decided to bring back the Champions Trophy, which was stopped after the 2017 edition. Former ICC CEO Dave Richardson said in 2018 that the tournament would clash with the 13-team ODI Super League. In the past, too, Full Member boards like the BCCI had said they did not want a Champions Trophy because it would hurt their bilateral revenues. So what made the ICC board bring back the tournament?
It provides a high-quality event in the ODI format at a time when there’s a lot of T20 cricket. The only reason it was discontinued between 2019 and 2023 was to create the opportunity for a T20 World Cup every two years. We had a very successful Champions Trophy in 2017 from all measures – whether it was on-field, attendance, ratings.It was a question of whether that event in the calendar added to the ODI pathway, which we felt it did. Again, it’s the same format: eight teams, two groups of four – so a short, sharp, high-quality ODI event. It provides a focal point for that format between World Cups.So what happens to the ODI Super League now?
Like the Test championship, the ODI Super League is one of those points of discussion with the members around the next FTP. The ODI Super League was about to start pretty much at the time that Covid struck and it’s been significantly disrupted. As we push towards the [2023] ODI World Cup and series start happening on a more frequent basis, the context around those matches will be important. Eight teams out of 13 are qualifying for a ten-team World Cup in India in 2023. What it looks like qualifying for a 14-team World Cup in 2027 still needs to be decided.Can you talk about the removal of the bidding process to determine the hosts for global events? It appeared as if the ICC had made a u-turn on what had been originally agreed in October 2019?
The hosts’ [selection] process is now underway. The most important part was finalising the calendar of events and the time of year in which those events would be played. What we have asked for is a preliminary technical submission. Which events is a particular member interested in hosting? Do they plan on hosting it on their own? Are they planning on hosting it in combination with another member country? Which venues are they proposing to use?On playing WTC matches at neutral venues: “I don’t think that the opportunity to play in front of home crowds is something the members would consider giving up”•Getty ImagesThe reason that finalising the calendar was important was because the number of matches and the length of the tournament has a knock-on effect on the number of venues used. The number of matches in the ODI World Cup and the T20 World Cup are quite high – 54 and 55 matches respectively. That’s going to take hosts with a fair degree of venue infrastructure to deliver those tournaments. With more teams, that also means training facilities and everything else. So there are going to be other events better suited to countries with a small number of venues.The Champions Trophy is potentially where venues are much more manageable, from the point of view of a host. We will get these preliminary submissions, look at the time of year, and how suitable playing cricket is at that time of year for each of the countries. Then we will invite a small number to put together a detailed submission, including all the necessary commitments a host needs to make to the ICC. Then the board will make a decision in September.This process is for men’s events?
Yeah. The process has started for the eight senior men’s events. For women’s events, Under-19s, Test championship finals, the process will kick off later in the year.So there will be no bidding process for the men’s events?
Each interested country will be invited to put in a submission. In terms of bidding, if you’re saying, putting together the best proposal or the best submission, then yes, absolutely [there is bidding]. If you’re implying it’s just whoever gives the most money, that will not be the case. That’s not dissimilar to what happened in 2006, when potential hosts for the cycle from 2007 to 2015 needed to put in submissions.

Babar Azam's low-risk approach leaves Pakistan without reward

Innings of 39 from 34 from captain and anchor proves overcautious in the final analysis

Matt Roller11-Nov-20211:59

Babar Azam: If Hasan Ali hadn’t dropped the catch, the ‘scenario would have been different’

Pakistan have only failed to defend a score of 176 or higher in T20 internationals three times. The first was a World Cup semi-final against Australia. The second was a game in which Babar Azam faced more than 30 balls and finished with a strike rate below 130. The third was a World Cup semi-final against Australia, in which Babar Azam faced more than 30 balls and finished with a strike rate below 130.Perhaps the crucial moment of Babar’s Thursday night came at half past five, when Aaron Finch correctly called “heads” as he flicked the coin at the toss. Chasing teams had won 10 games out of 11 in Dubai in this tournament – and eight out of eight under lights – and batting first in the knowledge that dew would affect the run chase meant that Pakistan needed to score comfortably above par in order to defend their score.They started like a team that knew a middling total would not be enough, taking 47 runs from the powerplay – their highest six-over score in the tournament. Mohammad Rizwan, who had spent the previous two nights in an intensive care unit following a chest infection, was attacking as much as he could, but struggling for timing and running with reluctance, rather than his usual enthusiasm. He was dropped twice inside the powerplay, and his uncharacteristic lack of control reflected his physical condition.Babar Azam struck 39 off 34 balls•AFP/Getty ImagesBabar, by contrast, looked in command as ever. He attacked Glenn Maxwell and Mitchell Marsh’s first overs, targeting the weak links, flicked Pat Cummins off his pads and drove Josh Hazlewood crisply through the covers. Fans chanted his name, purring at his class and poise – then watched him hole out to long-on for 39 off 34 balls. His strike rate, 114.70, was comfortably the lowest among the seven batters to reach double figures.No role in T20 batting line-ups splits opinion like the anchor, especially when their side bats first. Analysis of their performances is almost invariably : if the anchor’s team won, they were the glue giving more expansive players licence to tee off; if they lost, their slow-scoring forced others to take the wrong option and left them short of a defendable score. The truth generally lies somewhere in between.Even by his own standards, Babar’s innings was cautious. According to ESPNcricinfo’s ball-by-ball data, he played six attacking shots in 34 balls, the joint-fewest he had ever played in a T20I innings of more than 20 balls when batting first. On a true pitch, needing to score comfortably above par given the likely change in conditions later in the evening, it was felt like Babar was driving a Ferrari with the hand brake on.

Watch cricket live on ESPN+

Sign up for ESPN+ and catch all the action from the Men’s T20 World Cup live in the USA. Match highlights of the second semi-final is available in English, and in Hindi (USA only).

Australia stifled him well in the middle overs. After pulling Marsh for four through midwicket, Babar had 32 off 23 balls. He managed only 7 off his next 10: Marsh bowled full and straight to his field, Maxwell speared in fast offbreaks from round the wicket and Zampa cleverly varied his trajectory. That was enough to induce an attacking shot, a miscued slog-sweep straight down David Warner’s throat.”We always want to start well to set the tone for the guys coming after us,” Babar told ESPNcricinfo about his and Rizwan’s approach before the World Cup. “We communicate well, and if he’s struggling to tee off, I go after the bowlers, and if I’m struggling, he does.”Related

  • If it's Australia vs Pakistan at a World Cup, the only match-up that matters is their history

  • Wade, Stoinis tee off at the close to put Australia in final

  • Babar pinpoints dropped catch as Pakistan rue missed opportunity

  • Luck Index – Hasan Ali's drop costs Pakistan 15 priceless runs

This had been Pakistan’s blueprint throughout the tournament, and had worked to perfection: Babar and Rizwan laying a platform and keeping wickets in hand to allow the middle order freedom to tee off. On Thursday night, Pakistan added 105 runs in the second half of the innings after Babar’s dismissal the ball before drinks, with Fakhar Zaman teeing off as Australia went full at the death.Their total of 176 was the highest score in Dubai of the World Cup, and should have been enough. But, just as with England’s competitive first-innings total in Abu Dhabi 24 hours before, it was not. Pakistan had one foot in the final when the reverse-sweeping Maxwell was caught on the cover boundary but their seamers had a collective off-night, leaking 62 runs in four overs at the death.Five-and-a-half years ago in Mumbai, the spotlight fell on Ajinkya Rahane. His innings of 40 off 35 fulfilled the role his side had asked of him as India racked up 192 for 2 batting first in their semi-final, but when West Indies hauled it in with two balls to spare, it looked indefensible. In both instances, they were let down by poor bowling performances and dropped catches, but their innings were needlessly conservative.Babar’s innings did not cost Pakistan this game, but it reinforced a fundamental truth of this format: in T20, a refusal to take risks is the riskiest approach of all.

Tired, timid India fluff their lines again to leave World Cup hopes on the line

Confused strategy and selection hampers team that is currently less than the sum of its parts

Matt Roller31-Oct-20212:47

Gambhir: India have all the skills but not the mental toughness

One week and three hours after their T20 World Cup started, India have hit six sixes in 40 overs, taken two wickets, and are below Namibia in the points table of Group 2 of the Super 12s. Dubai International Stadium is two-thirds empty and scores are level with 34 balls left in New Zealand’s run chase but India have left three fielders out on the boundary, allowing Kane Williamson to knock an effortless single into a gap.It is a minor detail but one which encapsulates a disastrous week for this India side, laying bare a fatigued, confused performance in which a side brimming with talent and verve has played within itself to leave them on the brink of elimination. “There’s only one way to play in T20 cricket: you have to be optimistic, you have to be positive,” Virat Kohli said after the game but his side have been timid, hesitant and – most pertinently – exhausted.Related

Mahela Jayawardene: 'Rohit Sharma should have opened against New Zealand'

Luck went against India, but so did their T20 template

When India needed their captain to stand up, he stood tall

Sodhi, Santner and Mitchell put India on the brink

Group 2 scenarios: What do India, Afghanistan and New Zealand have to do to make the semi-finals?

India are still mathematically alive in this tournament but even three crushing wins against Afghanistan, Scotland and Namibia would not guarantee qualification for the semi-finals. A month in the UAE during the IPL should have provided ideal preparation for local conditions; instead, India’s batters have struggled to adapt to slowish pitches and their bowlers have lacked any potency once dew has taken hold.Many will point to the fact that India have lost both tosses in a tournament where chasing sides have dominated but that alone is an insufficient explanation. They have constructed a batting order featuring several ‘anchors’, which intends to keep wickets in hand, but have made 36 for 3 and 35 for 2 in their two powerplays, then nudged their way to par and below-par scores despite knowing dew will make it harder to defend.Damningly, this is nothing new. India have been an excellent chasing team since the last World Cup five-and-a-half years ago, winning 23 games out of 32 when batting second. But they have consistently struggled to defend totals, doing so successfully 22 times out of 41 (24 including Super Over wins), speaking to their conservatism when batting first.Watch cricket live on ESPN+

Sign up for ESPN+ and catch all the action from the Men’s T20 World Cup live in the USA. Match highlights of India vs New Zealand is available here in English, and here in Hindi (US only).

The build-up to this tournament has been defined by muddled thinking and inconsistency in batting roles, epitomised by their reshuffle after Suryakumar Yadav’s injury ruled him out of this game. In March, Kohli said that he would open in the IPL for RCB in preparation for the World Cup and that he would “definitely like to partner Rohit [Sharma] at the top”. Two weeks ago, he said it was a “no-brainer” that KL Rahul would open, moving him down to No. 3. After the Pakistan defeat, he mocked a journalist who suggested that Ishan Kishan – who had been told by Kohli during the IPL that he was seen as an opener – could have played ahead of Rohit. Against New Zealand, Kishan opened with Rahul, with Rohit at No. 3 and Kohli shuffling down to No. 4.The result has been a batting line-up that has been paralysed by indecision, struggling to find the desired balance between attacking intent and stability. Despite losing two wickets in the powerplay, India’s slow scoring meant that they had to keep attacking through the middle overs if they had any chance of compiling a defendable score.”We realised that once you lose the toss, the wicket changes in the second innings,” Jasprit Bumrah said. “It was a discussion that we wanted to give the cushion to the bowlers. In doing that, we played a lot of attacking shots that didn’t come off today.”How, then, to defend Kohli’s innings, nudging his way to 9 off 16 balls before slog-sweeping Ish Sodhi straight to long-on? It set the tone for a dismal middle phase of the innings: India failed to score a single boundary between the powerplay and the end of the 16th over for only the third time in T20Is.Rishabh Pant’s innings, a dour 12 off 19, encapsulated their struggle. Indian cricket has constantly demanded “responsibility” from its most effervescent young talent in the four-and-a-half years since his international debut and this was the result: a natural six-hitter weighed down by the burden of a buzzword. He struggled for timing throughout while attempting to rotate the strike and when he finally freed his arms, he was bowled by a 90mph/144kph nip-backer by Adam Milne. Never before had he scored as slowly in an innings of more than 10 balls.Virat Kohli walks back after being dismissed by Ish Sodhi•ICC via Getty”Every time we felt like we wanted to take a chance, we lost a wicket,” Kohli said. “That happens in T20 cricket but that’s a result of hesitation when you think should you go for a shot or not.” The toil of more than a year spent travelling between biosecure bubbles surely played a part in that self-doubt but India are hardly the only team to have suffered that fate. Their multi-format players have been on the go since the World Test Championship final in June and must be sick of the sight of New Zealand: they are due to play them in a T20I series nine days after their final Super 12s fixture as the treadmill keeps on spinning.With the ball, Bumrah and Varun Chakravarthy made bright starts, but the rest of their attack struggled with their lengths and were duly punished. Two of their five main bowlers – Ravindra Jadeja and Shardul Thakur – had been selected in part because of the extra batting depth they provided, but India’s sluggish scoring through the middle and the eventual use of the half-fit Hardik Pandya’s medium pace displayed a lack of trust in them, both with bat and ball. Their selection has highlighted a team taking the safe option in a format that rewards risk.India may yet qualify for the semi-finals of this World Cup but it may serve them better in the long term if they do not. Their defeat to West Indies in the 2016 tournament, in which their obsession with running twos and keeping wickets in hand was shown up by a team of power-hitters, did not lead to any obvious change in their T20 strategy; perhaps a humbling exit in Kohli’s final act as captain will signal a culture shift.It would be complacent not to credit New Zealand for a disciplined, clinical performance in which they barely gave India a sniff, two dropped catches apart. Their bowlers were immaculate in their lines throughout, offering very little width, and their batters targeted the weak links in India’s attack to great effect.It was telling that their two match-winners against a who’s who of IPL stars could hardly be further from playing in the league: Daryl Mitchell’s only overseas T20 experience was half a season at Middlesex, while Ish Sodhi was hired by Rajasthan Royals as a liaison officer earlier this year. New Zealand are a team greater than the sum of their parts; the contrast with their opposition could not have been clearer.

Suryakumar and Venkatesh – doing the dirty work, and giving it a good scrub

The two men, entrusted with different but equally difficult jobs, are key pieces to India’s white-ball jigsaw

Shashank Kishore21-Feb-2022″The SKY is the limit”. Suryakumar Yadav might have had enough of the joke, but doesn’t deny anyone the pleasure of saying it at press conferences. He laughs instead, contented at how things are shaping up for him.In March 2021, he was just like one of many players on the fringes of the national team. At 30, he wasn’t sure if the India cap would ever come his way. Blockbuster IPLs since 2018 for Mumbai Indians, apart from tons of runs in domestic cricket for a better part of four seasons prior to the pandemic, hadn’t led to any joy. There were no guarantees. But, as he transformed himself, training the mind to be calm and not let non-selection nibble away at him, magic happened.Related

  • Dravid targeting flexibility in roles, continuity in selections

  • Suryakumar Yadav just wants to be Suryakumar Yadav

  • 'Blessed I had to struggle to understand the value of cricket'

The call came, and he began his international career by hooking Jofra Archer for six. Life hasn’t quite been the same since. From starting off as a middle-order back-up for Shreyas Iyer – his shoulder injury got him much-needed game time last year – he has broken the door down with heaps of runs. He soaks up pressure, carries the team along calmly like a decade-old veteran, without losing his batting enterprise.The limited-overs matches against West Indies have merely underscored Suryakumar’s value in the set-up. He stamped his presence when the team needed it the most in both formats, not just rescuing the innings when needed, like on Sunday in the final T20I, when he hit a 31-ball 65, but also ensuring he was there right till the end to see the team through choppy waters, like in the first T20I when he scored 34* in 18.The secret to Suryakumar’s game is the calmness that allows him to line up bowlers at the last second. He gives away very little until the bowler has delivered, and then uses the last split-second to make minute adjustments, before allowing his famed hand-eye coordination and wrists to take over. When he strikes them, it’s like in a symphony – the coming together of all elements in perfect coordination. Like the shot that had Dominic Drakes sit back and watch in disbelief as a perfectly acceptable length delivery on off was dispatched over the fine-leg boundary. Suryakumar stood still until Drakes delivered, and then quickly moved across to get down on his back knee to lap-sweep him deep into the stands.What makes Suryakumar’s approach even more refreshing is his adaptability. When he came into bat on Sunday, India were at 66 for 3 in the 11th over. Then Rohit Sharma fell in the 14th. This didn’t affect Suryakumar’s tempo. You didn’t get the sense that his freedom was being restricted. You didn’t get the sense that he was edgy and moving around to manufacture shots. It was as if he was perfectly in sync with India’s situation, dropping anchor, rotating strike, running hard and putting the bad balls away at the first opportunity.ESPNcricinfo Ltd”It was important to stay till the end when Rohit got out,” he said after being adjudged Player of the Match. “We had a chat in our team meetings as well as to how we are going to react in such situations. I’m just trying to repeat the same things which I have been doing in the last few games. Whenever the situation arrives, I try to stay there till the end. Be a little harsh on yourself in the nets, that’s it.”But what’s better than having one good finisher in the batting order, is having two of them. On Sunday, they shellacked 86 in the death overs, the most India have ever made in a T20I.In this case, opposite Suryakumar was Venkatesh Iyer. Unlike his partner, Venkatesh’s drive into the big lane hasn’t been built on years of domestic success, but on the back of a season-changing IPL 2021, where he was Kolkata Knight Riders’ enforcer up top. But when India needed a back-up for Hardik Pandya, following a poor T20 World Cup campaign, they went to Venkatesh, and he hasn’t disappointed so far.Unlike in the IPL, Venkatesh bats at six for India. It’s a position where you train yourself to bat five, ten, 15, 20 balls, or maybe 25. It’s a position where you have much more to lose than gain. Cheap dismissals in the death overs while looking for the big shots in a high-scoring game could leave you wondering if that’s that. It can force you to shun your free-stroking nature in search of consistency. Venkatesh has had none of it, yet.The first ball he faced in T20Is, against New Zealand, was sent to the boundary, at a time when India’s chase was getting tense. Off his second, he tried an inventive reverse scoop, only to be caught.But he has been given a rope, and he is using it well.In the ongoing series, twice in three games, Venkatesh finished the innings off smartly, sustaining the late-order tempo. In the second T20I, he combined with Rishabh Pant to hit 76 off 35 balls to set up a match-winning score. On Sunday, he combined with Suryakumar to ensure India found their lower-order muscle. In the first, he saw India home after they lost a flurry of wickets to make a straightforward chase challenging. He finished the T20I series with scores of 24*, 33 and 35*. More importantly, he struck at 179.24.Venkatesh isn’t a blind slogger. He has a method that comes with refreshing clarity of his own game. His first two strokes on Sunday were proper cover drives – one lofted and the other along the ground. He latches on to short balls quickly and uses his long levers to play them with muscle. When he plays the pull, there are no half-measures.Venkatesh Iyer has conditioned himself to be the sixth bowler Rohit Sharma can trust•BCCIThen, as the sixth bowler, Venkatesh has conditioned himself to bowl the tough overs. As the chase got tense in the second T20I, Venkatesh even walked up to Rohit asking to be given the ball. Rohit didn’t go down that route, but later spoke of how impressed he was with Venkatesh’s attitude of wanting to be in the line of fire, wanting to take ownership and win games for the team.On Sunday, India had an unfortunate injury with Deepak Chahar hobbling out after just 1.5 overs. India needed to make up the remaining overs. Enter Venkatesh. He saw his first ball walloped for six, but he held his nerve, backed his strengths, and walked off with the wickets of Jason Holder and Kieron Pollard. It was almost like that was the game, right there.”He’s had a really good series for us. After he played the three T20s against New Zealand, you could sort of see his potential,” Rahul Dravid said of Venkatesh. “We kind of gave him the clarity on the kind of role we have for him. I know he plays a slightly different role for his IPL franchise up here in Kolkata, but we were very clear with him as to what kind of role we see him filling in seeing our situation, because in our top three there isn’t really a spot. Guys are established and we have guys who have performed in the top three.”So we challenged him and gave him the role to be able to bat in that position [as a finisher]. Every time he has come back from a break, he has improved, gotten better, and his performances are better and that’s pleasing, that’s what you want to see. How they improve, get better, and respond to those challenges, and his bowling is coming along every time.”Even in these three games… he bowled a very good over in the first T20I, got us a couple of wickets here. Like I tell him, the role of a sixth bowler is not always to be called upon to bowl, but in a situation like today, where we lost someone like Deepak, you may be called upon to bowl a few critical overs. That is the role of a sixth bowler, to be able to use when it’s required. If you’re having a good day and the captain doesn’t need you, he doesn’t need you. But when he needs you, he will need you at a critical time and he’s done a very good job. He has had a great series, I must say that.”Both Suryakumar and Venkatesh, in their current roles, are key pieces to India’s T20I jigsaw going forward. And their performances, the consistency, coming at a time when the team is finalising options for Australia 2022, can only mean lesser headaches for the Indian team management.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus