Sloppiness douses Pakistan's fire

Pakistan found early momentum against Australia, but gave it away through fumbles, when they just needed to field normally, not spectacularly. The approach was mirrored with the bat, with everybody looking for big shots

Sidharth Monga in Mohali25-Mar-20161:08

‘We need to pick better fielders next time’ – Younis

When you go into a match looking for a Pakistan-like comeback that defies logic, you are looking for that one definitive moment that gives them irresistible momentum. That they can do so from hopeless situations is what makes them such a beloved team. In the 2009 World T20, it was that Shahid Afridi catch running back and over his head. In the 1992 World Cup, Inzamam-ul-Haq’s cameos gave them that momentum. Usually, though, those moments come with the ball. Against hope, Pakistan were hoping they would get such a moment, and then for everything to magically fall in place.There were moments when Pakistan bowled. Wahab Riaz bowled a superb slower ball followed by a quick and full delivery that beat Usman Khawaja more comprehensively than he has been beaten since perhaps the start of the Big Bash League. That’s a moment you can rally around, but consider this: Australia were already 28 in the fourth over when they should have been only 21. Shoaib Malik had let one through his legs at point, Umar Akmal had dived over a drive at short extra cover.Still, Pakistan found their way back through individual brilliance. In his next over, Wahab came back with a lovely ball that jagged back in to hit top of the middle and leg stumps of David Warner. That’s the kind of ball you can rally around. Wahab’s celebration suggested Pakistan might be on to something. In the same over, though, Mohammad Sami chased after a ball to deep midwicket slower than you can get inside an Indian cricket ground. And then took longer to throw the ball than it takes to get out. And there, ladies and gentlemen, not counting any overthrows, we had the first all-run four of this tournament. Perhaps the first in a Twenty20 international in India, considering the sizes of the grounds and the quickness of the outfields.

By a generous account, Pakistan let go 18 runs through ground fielding that doesn’t match up to international standards in 2016

Khalid Latif and Sharjeel Khan, batsmen both, added themselves – as they have been doing – to the bowlers as candidates to be hidden in the field. By a generous account, Pakistan let go 18 runs through ground fielding that doesn’t match up to international standards in 2016. Deep fielders were slow to set off the mark, short fine leg wouldn’t go after balls hit to square leg, the backing up was non-existent. In comparison you would see a deep square leg and a short fine leg from Australia competing with each other to rush in towards the stumps for a throw from wide long-off.It’s not just about 18 runs although that itself is a big number – they were poorer in the field against New Zealand, and they lost by 22 runs. It is about the pressure that the lack of these runs creates on the batsmen, making them play lower-percentage shots, which can result in wickets. Australia were 77 at the end of 10 overs when they really should have been 67 had Pakistan fielded normally. Just normally, not spectacularly.The approach was mirrored with the bat with everybody looking for big shots. At one point, when Khawaja made a chase at the boundary followed by a tumbling save that included a misfield, Akmal and Latif took just the two runs. When Ahmed Shehzad skied one early on, he and Sharjeel didn’t bother to cross.Shahid Afridi did bowl well, but you wouldn’t want to get started on his captaincy. Pakistan are the only side in this tournament who have gone without playing a specialist spinner even once. On a slow pitch, with the quicker bowlers going for a tap, he didn’t call upon Shoaib Malik.It is easy to say Pakistan have always been slow in the field and lazy with the running, and they have still won big. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis might have had twice the wickets they did had they had half-decent slip fielders. You never saw Inzamam-ul-Haq run hard. Just cast your minds back to all those awesome memories of Pakistan on a roll, and you will see hustling fielders, charging at balls, wanting the ball to come to them, encouraging the bowlers, backing up throws. More importantly, fielding, the effort put in it, is quite a fair indicator of how much the team wants to be out there.The skillful comebacks that make jaws drop are great to watch, but for the team itself to always rely on them is not a great idea.

England on verge of the complete set

If England win or draw the final Test against Pakistan at The Oval it will mean they hold all nine bilateral series. ESPNcricinfo recaps how they secured, or retained, the other eight

Andrew McGlashan09-Aug-2016Australia: 3-2, 2015England regained the Ashes last year with convincing victories at Cardiff, Edgbaston and Trent Bridge. The series-clinching victory came in astonishing style as Stuart Broad’s 8 for 15 demolished Australia for 60 inside the first session on his home ground in Nottingham. Australia secured two equally overwhelming wins in London, but as in 2009 and 2013 lost too many key moments over the five matches.Bangladesh: 2-0, 2010It remains uncertain whether England will face Bangladesh for the first time in six years later this year due to security concerns. Their last meeting was in England with the home side comfortable winners once they found their stride, but Tamim Iqbal lit up the two matches with back-to-back hundreds at Lord’s and Old Trafford. Steven Finn was England’s Player of the Series.India: 3-1, 2014Like this current series, England went behind with a defeat at Lord’s, beaten at their own game on a seaming wicket. It left Alastair Cook on the brink of quitting – his form had also deserted him – but at the Ageas Bowl there was a rally both individually, as Cook made 95, and collectively as Moeen Ali helped secure an impressive all-round win. After that, England trampled all over India’s batting on two favourable pitches at Old Trafford and The Oval.New Zealand: 1-1, 2015England haven’t lost a series to New Zealand since 1999, but haven’t always dominated. Their victory at Lord’s was outstanding – overcoming an even bigger deficit than they did against Pakistan at Edgbaston – inspired by Ben Stokes’ blistering hundred and a captain’s innings from Cook before England bowled out New Zealand out on a gripping final day. Headingley, not for the first time, did not go well, however, as New Zealand – in the style of their captain, Brendon McCullum – threw caution to wind with the bat then spun to victory on the final day.South Africa: 2-1, 2015-16A significant overseas triumph, sealed, like the Ashes, by a Stuart Broad special. He tore through South Africa on the third afternoon in Johannesburg with 6 for 17 to set up a seven-wicket win. England had opened with an outstanding victory in Durban, followed by Stokes’ record-breaking 258 in a high-scoring Cape Town draw. Kagiso Rabada’s 11 wickets won the dead-rubber, saving face but not the series.Sri Lanka: 2-0, 2016Earlier this season, England did an efficient job on a callow Sri Lanka team overawed by the conditions. James Anderson bagged ten at Headingley then Moeen Ali’s career-best 155 rescued an iffy batting display in Chester-le-Street. After being on the verge of embarrassment in the second Test, Sri Lanka found their fight with Dinesh Chandimal’s hundred but they were too far behind for it to make a difference.James Anderson made his debut the last time England faced Zimbabwe•Getty ImagesWest Indies: 1-1, 2015An unconvincing way to keep hold of the Wisden Trophy. England could not bowl West Indies out in 130 overs in Antigua as Jason Holder made an unbeaten hundred, but Anderson did inspire an impressive final-day victory push on a flat pitch in Grenada to ensure England could not lose the series. However, in Barbados, they capitulated – much to the delight of West Indies who had been labelled ‘mediocre’ by the incoming ECB chairman Colin Graves – as they fell to a five-wicket defeat. It would prove to be Peter Moores’ final Test as head coach.Zimbabwe: 2-0, 2003Due to political reasons, Zimbabwe have not been the opposition since a two-match series 13 years ago. They were overwhelmed by an innings in both Tests. Anderson bagged five wickets on his debut at Lord’s, before the more unlikely swing bowlers of Mark Butcher and Anthony McGrath shared seven in the second innings. At Chester-le-Street, Richard Johnson marked his debut with 6 for 33 – five of his wickets being lbw including two in his first over.

What can we expect from two-division Test cricket?

The ICC’s plans to bring meaningful context to the format and to expand its horizons have been rejected before, but this time things are looking up

Tim Wigmore13-Jun-2016Since it was first played in 1877, Test cricket has been a byword for conservatism. This image of a game impervious to shifting sands conceals how much has actually been altered: Tests have been scheduled over three, four, five, six or unlimited days, on uncovered or covered pitches; overs have been six or eight balls long, delivered by cricketers bowling underarm or overarm; the number of teams has risen from two to ten; and in recent years, the DRS and day-night games have been introduced. Evolution has been constant.Yet perhaps none of these changes are as significant as the ones that could be ratified at the end of June. The introduction of two divisions – seven teams in Division One, and five, including two new Test nations, in Division Two, playing under a league system to determine promotion and relegation every two years – would give Test cricket a context and structure that it has always lacked.Meritocracy would no longer be anathema to Test cricket. Any of the ICC’s 105 members would have the opportunity to reach the pinnacle, based on their performances. Order would be created out of Test cricket’s chaotic, disjointed and sometimes downright irrational scheduling. It would be the most radical move in the history of the Test game, and it is envisaged it will lead to Tests generating more interest and cash, safeguarding the longest format’s future.”Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it,” Mark Twain once bemoaned. The same has long been true about “protecting the primacy of Test cricket”: much talked about by administrators but seldom acted upon. Day-night Tests are welcome but don’t address how to give Tests greater relevance. The idea of points across formats in a series, introduced by England this summer, is an attempt to create more context, but how is a series super if it does not count towards anything?This time no one can accuse the ICC of modest tweaking while being oblivious to the fundamental issues Tests face, the administrative equivalent of debating the colour of the curtains while the house is burning down. Led by David Richardson, the ICC has come up with a plan that it believes can save Test cricket, and ensure it can peacefully coexist with T20.Each team in Division One would play every other side home or away over a two-year cycle. Most of these would be three-match series – so nine Tests at home and nine away every two years, 18 in total. Each match and each series would be apportioned a certain number of points. It could be as simple as three points for a win in a match, and one for a draw, though the details are still being thrashed out. These points determine the overall standings. At the end of each two-year cycle – the first would begin after the 2019 World Cup and end in early 2021 – there would be a winner of Division One, effectively a winner of the World Test League, and the bottom side that would be relegated.Unlike now, when the Test rankings have little integrity, and are fiendishly complicated, such a structure would be simple and easily understood, and build towards producing a clearly identifiable winner. Never again would we have a new No. 1 for bureaucratic reasons, as often happens when old results are discounted from the rankings every April and the Test mace changes hands.

Moving the World T20 back to every two years will raise $400-500 million in extra profit every eight-year cycle. These funds would be more than enough to bankroll the two Test divisions

Division Two would be structured similarly to Division One, but it would only include five teams, with each playing the other home or away, perhaps in two-Test series, amounting to eight Tests each every two years. The winner would automatically be promoted, while the side finishing second might have a playoff, against the team finishing sixth in Division One, to determine who would be in Division One for the next cycle.The bottom team in Division Two would face a playoff with the top team in the Intercontinental Cup, which would remain a first-class competition. The I-Cup would be played by six countries – playing two matches at home every two years and two away, with the final round played out concurrently in the UAE – and the bottom side would also face relegation, probably after a playoff with the leading team in the World Cricket League structure below the I-Cup.Aspects of this plan might sound familiar, and in many ways they are. Something similar was proposed by Rohan Sajdeh of the Boston Consulting Group in 2008 (which had been commissioned by Cricket Australia) but was rejected, partly because teams did not get enough freedom in the schedule to stage the most lucrative series. Two years ago Australia, England and India tried to introduce promotion and relegation, with eight teams playing Test cricket and the rest in the I-Cup. The only snag? The Big Three would be exempt from relegation.That would not be the case this time. “If we end up in Division Two, it is our own fault, simple as that,” ECB chairman Colin Graves recently said.The attitude shift is not only explained by the change in personnel among the Big Three. It also owes to the essential pragmatism of what is being proposed. The structure would only occupy about five months a year, deliberately leaving gaps in the schedule for teams to organise extra matches, including against teams from different divisions.The Ashes could remain a five-Test series played on its current cycle no matter what. If Australia and England were in the same division, then only three Tests would count towards the league standings. Or, less simply, each Test would be weighted to give the series the same overall points as a three-match series.The freedom to organise extra matches means that relegation to Division Two need not be catastrophic, especially as the mandatory schedule in Division Two would be light. If India were in Division Two, they would only be compelled to play four home Tests every two years – a minuscule obligation set against the 13 Tests planned for their next home summer – which would leave them ample time to organise more attractive Tests.Other countries in Division Two might also be able to arrange extra matches against Division One sides. If Bangladesh were in Division Two, teams could play a Test there as preparation for touring other countries in the subcontinent, just as they could play Ireland before touring England, or Zimbabwe before touring South Africa.With the prospect of teams like Ireland being invited to play Tests, cricket looks set to finally shed its insular image•Getty ImagesThe pragmatism of the envisaged reforms reflects the realities of world cricket; the ICC’s need is not to devise a utopian structure but simply a good structure that will secure enough votes to be made a reality. It is no coincidence that seven countries would be in Division One, and the proposals would need the vote of seven of the ten Full Member representatives in the ICC board to get through.Yet even teams in Division Two could have something to gain, especially if they negotiated deals with Division One countries guaranteeing some matches outside of the structure – an obvious sweetener to the three Full Members who would initially be in Division Two.Bangladesh and Zimbabwe play so few matches against the top nations now – Zimbabwe have been temporarily removed from the rankings as a result – that the chance to lift themselves up to Division One, and receive regular guaranteed matches, might appeal.The gravest concerns are for West Indies. Their place in Division Two would be a sobering reminder of how far they have fallen, and they have no geographical neighbours in Division One, perhaps making it harder for them to entice Division One sides to play there. Yet the WICB might view the chance to establish the side in Division One as something more appealing than them continuing to bumble along near the bottom of the Test rankings. The aspiration could also be a unifying force in the Caribbean.The ICC’s challenge is not merely to get a new structure passed but to work out how to pay for it. One favoured option is to introduce competition grants for each country playing Test cricket, covering the costs of each team’s matches within the structure, and then leaving it up to the nations to fund any extra cricket they arrange. Some of the money needed to fund the new structure could come from redirecting the Test Cricket Fund. The rest could be found by resolving the ICC’s imminent dilemma about what to do with all its extra cash.Moving the World T20 back to every two years will raise US$400-500 million in extra profit every eight-year cycle. These funds would be more than enough to bankroll the two Test divisions. Effectively, T20 would be subsidising Test matches, just as some TV stations use soaps to subsidise documentaries.More ambitiously, the ICC has tentatively discussed selling all Test matches within the structure collectively, although this would require many more months of negotiation even if two divisions are voted through.

If India were in Division Two they would only be compelled to play four home Tests every two years, which would leave them ample time to organise more attractive Tests

In the English Premier League and beyond, it is the norm for teams to sell rights collectively, which generates more money than them doing so individually. After it had given out the relevant competition grants, the ICC would then distribute surplus funds to members according to an agreed formula. India would still receive far more than any other country, but the hope is that everyone could be better off.Either way, a funding mechanism needs to be devised, so that sides do not lose out if their series with India in Division One happens to be away, depriving them of the proceeds of home TV rights.Even if the TV rights are not sold collectively, the proposed new structure would boost the economic value of Tests, believes Simon Chadwick, a sports business expert from the University of Salford. In sports the world over, fans have shown they are more likely to watch matches with consequences – those that are part of a competition rather than merely bilateral contests.The popularity of Rugby sevens has rocketed since the World Rugby Sevens Series was introduced in 1999. Hockey has just agreed to a new structure giving matches greater context. In cricket the soaring value of ICC events contrasts with the stagnating value for bilateral fixtures, including ODIs and T20Is.The reforms would also mean that supporters in one country had a stake in the results of other matches, as they could impact their prospects of winning the league or being relegated – and if even a tiny percentage of English or Indian fans had a new reason to watch New Zealand play Sri Lanka, say, the economics of the series could be transformed.If Full Member boards can be convinced of this financial argument, it bodes well for the ICC’s plans. Nothing drives votes quite like self-interest. Richardson has tried to introduce divisions in Tests since 2004. He and the rest of the ICC’s management have been frustrated more than they would care to remember. This time could just be different.

Manjrekar: This India team meant for higher challenges

Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar analyses the reasons behind India’s clinical win in the first Test and why West Indies could barely put up a fight

ESPNcricinfo staff26-Jul-2016‘Ashwin looks ready for England, South Africa and Australia’Sanjay Manjrekar believes R Ashwin’s feat of 17 five-wicket hauls in 33 Tests has elevated him to ‘Muralitharan-esque’ form2:15

Manjrekar: Ashwin looks ready for Eng, SA and Australia

‘This India team meant for higher challenges’Though India put in a clinical performance in the first Test against West Indies, Manjrekar says the hosts did not really put up a challenge1:55

Manjrekar: This India team meant for higher challenges

What’s gone wrong with West Indies?West Indies have one of the weakest batting and bowling line-ups in the world and Manjrekar feels this must be fixed at their first-class level3:23

What’s gone wrong with West Indies?

Root double-century keeps England on top

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Jul-2016… and soon brought up his 150, his fifth in Test cricket•Getty ImagesHe was congratulated by his partner, Chris Woakes …•Getty Images… who uppercut a six over third man en route to his own half-century•Getty ImagesIt was Woakes’ second fifty in three Tests of a breakthrough summer•Getty ImagesBut on 58, he became Yasir Shah’s first wicket in 39 overs of hard toil•AFPBen Stokes batted with a measure of restraint in his first innings since injury•AFPBut he was unimpressed to be adjudged caught behind by DRS for 34•Getty ImagesJonny Bairstow survived a dropped catch by Sarfraz Ahmed, on 9•Getty ImagesRoot, however, powered on to his second Test double-hundred•Getty ImagesHe brought up his double-hundred with a reverse sweep for four•Getty ImagesIt was his highest Test score to date, beating his 200 not out against Sri Lanka in 2014•Getty ImagesHe eventually fell for 254 and was congratulated as he left by Misbah-ul-Haq …•AFP… and Yasir Shah as well•AFPHe departed the field to a standing ovation•Getty ImagesIn reply, Woakes made England’s first incision with the wicket of Mohammad Hafeez•Getty ImagesThen snaffled Azhar Ali with a high catch in his followthrough•Getty ImagesBen Stokes chipped in with the vital scalp of Younis Khan for 1•Getty ImagesWoakes claimed his third when the nightwatchman Rahat Ali was caught at short leg•Getty ImagesShan Masood battled to the close for a brave 30 not out•Getty Images

Anderson injury offers England room for manoeuvre

Despite being the leading English-qualified spinner in the 2016 season there was no place for Jack Leach in England’s touring squad but there remains a chance that could change

George Dobell31-Oct-2016England will resist the immediate temptation to send for reinforcements ahead of the tour of India, but it remains possible a player could be added to the squad in the coming weeks.Having suffered a chastening final day in Mirpur, where they missed several opportunities in the field and lost all 10 wickets in a session, there might have been a temptation to refresh a squad that is struggling to both play and bowl spin as well as the opposition. Alastair Cook, the captain, admitted on Sunday that England “haven’t got world-class spinners”.But while James Whitaker, the national selector, has confirmed England will keep faith with the 16-man squad originally named for the tour, replacement players will be called up in case of injury. That could even include the possibility of replacing James Anderson who was not named in the original tour party for the India series with the understanding that he would join the squad if he was deemed to be fit.”We’ve picked our squad and we stand by that,” Whitaker told ESPNcricinfo. “If someone is injured or becomes unwell, we can look at making changes but these are the players we believe are best equipped for the job.”James Anderson continues to make his comeback from injury at Loughborough and we will assess his fitness before deciding what his involvement on the tour will be.”Trevor Bayliss on…

Gary Ballance: “He’s more disappointed than anyone. He’s a guy that practices very hard, is very intense and he wants to do well so badly. He’s got a couple of good balls but he’ll be a discussion point, I’m sure.”

Haseeb Hameed: “We knew before the series started that he was waiting in the wings and can obviously play. It is an option for us. There will have to be some soul-searching in the next few days.”

Bangladesh: “We were outplayed. We weren’t consistent enough. If Bangladesh have more wickets like this, they’ve got a fair chance of winning more Test matches.”

India: “It’s going to be difficult, that’s for sure. We’re going to have play some very good cricket, but we’ve got that in us. We’ve shown in previous series we’ve been able to come back after losses. We’ve got to dig deep and play a very good team playing in their home conditions.”

One of the great truisms of cricket is that a player’s reputation can often improve most when he is not playing. So, with England’s spinners struggling to match the potency of their Bangladesh counterparts, the calls for the inclusion of Somerset’s Jack Leach or Middlesex’s Ollie Rayner have intensified.Leach, a left-arm spinner, claimed 65 Championship wickets during the 2016 season at an average of 21.87. No England-qualified player claimed more in Division One. Rayner, the Middlesex off-spinner, claimed 51 Championship wickets at an average of 23.56. By comparison with the spinners in England’s squad, Gareth Batty claimed 41 at 31.21, Adil Rashid claimed 32 at 33.84 and Zafar Ansari 22 at 31.40. All five of them played in Division One of the County Championship.Leach is in some ways an unlikely saviour. While Jos Buttler, his team-mate from Somerset youth teams, was soon fast tracked as a special talent, Leach was obliged to take a job parking trolleys in a Taunton supermarket as he attempted to pursue a career in the game.He has developed steadily, however, and is now an admirably consistent bowler. And while England are relatively well-served with spinners who turn the ball into right-handed batsmen (Moeen Ali and Graeth Batty have probably been the most reliable of England’s spinners on the tour to date), Leach might have offered England another option for a spinner who takes the ball away from them.While his excellent record in the 2016 Championship season comes with something of a caveat – Somerset played on pitches providing an unusual amount of assistance to spin bowlers – it is likely that England will encounter similar surfaces in India. His experience of operating on such surfaces might therefore have been useful and Somerset, who were criticised for preparing such surfaces, could argue that they were preparing England players for the challenge ahead.Most of England’s spinners have little experience of bowling in helpful conditions. Moeen, for example, developed on an unresponsive New Road surface and, when he did come across a helpful track, often found himself as second spinner behind Batty – until he moved to Surrey – or Saeed Ajmal. For that reason, he is still learning to deal with the expectation and pressure of bowling in circumstances where spinners are required to lead the attack.But the selectors have concluded that to make changes now would suggest panic and argue that the reasons for selecting the current squad remain as valid now as they did a few weeks ago. Leach, for example, is still seen as an inexperienced player who has yet to have the chance to familiarise himself with the England environment. He will depart for a Lions trip to the UAE shortly, though, and it remains possible that, should an injury befall any of the bowlers, he could be called up.Jack Leach had an oustanding county season•Getty ImagesThat includes Anderson. If he is ruled out of the tour in the coming days – and it seems a decision will be made in the next week – it is entirely possible the selectors could replace him with a spinner. The team management could argue that such a move would not be a sign of panic or demonstrate any lack of faith in the current squad, but represent a natural replacement for a bowler who would have been with the squad had he been fully fit.It would make little sense to replace Anderson with another seamer. England already have several options in that department – Stuart Broad and Jake Ball sat out the second Test in Mirpur, for example – but they have fewer spin options. Leach could, therefore, yet find himself in India within a few weeks.Meanwhile, England are sticking to their original plan to take a few days off before beginning preparations for the India leg of the tour. They fly to Mumbai on Wednesday and do not have any full training sessions planned until Saturday. Then they fly to Rajkot on Sunday where they will step up their preparations ahead of the first Test starting on Wednesday, November 9. Some players are likely to arrange net sessions in their days off, but there will be no official warm-up match.”The boys have been training very hard since we’ve been here,” Trevor Bayliss, the coach, said. “It’s been a fairly hectic two or three weeks, so I think part of it will be mental and physical rest so that we’re fresh going into those matches.”It’s not all about practice, practice, practice, even though that’s what people might think we need to do. But when the guys practice we want to practice properly and get our confidence for those matches.”

Explainer – Why the BCCI changed its stance on DRS

Higher frame rates for cameras and a safeguard to prevent operator error were the key improvements in technology that led to the BCCI agreeing to trial the system

Nagraj Gollapudi21-Oct-2016Despite winning the 2011 World Cup and the 2013 Champions Trophy with DRS in place, India had resisted using the system in bilateral series. On Wednesday the ICC general manager Geoff Allardice and a representative from Hawk-Eye, the ball-tracking technology provider, met top BCCI officials along with India coach Anil Kumble in Delhi.Allardice focused on the independent assessment of the technologies used in the DRS, which was carried out by engineers from the field-intelligence unit at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT]. The Hawk-Eye presentation explained how ball-tracking technology has been enhanced over the last couple of years.The upshot of the meeting was that two days later India agreed to use the DRS on a trial basis during the Test series against England. Here’s an explainer of what their concerns were and how they were allayed.Why did the BCCI not want the DRS?
The main reason was a mistrust of the ball-tracking technology used to adjudge lbws. The BCCI said the predicted path after the ball hit the pad was not reliable.How does ball-tracking work?
Three elements go into an lbw decision: where the ball pitched, the point of impact on the pad, and the predicted path towards the stumps. The accuracy of the predicted path of the ball depends on the number of images captured – the frame-rate – between the ball pitching and hitting the pad.What is the most significant change in the technology?
Cameras with a higher frame rate, and the ability to locate the point of impact on the pad more accurately.The Tests against England will be India’s second bilateral series with all aspects of the DRS•Getty ImagesHow fast are the frame rates now?
During the 2011 World Cup, the frame rate of Hawk-Eye’s cameras was 50 to 75 frames per second. Hawk-Eye’s ultra-motion cameras recorded images at a faster rate in 2013, and their current ball-tracking cameras record images at 340 frames per second.How will a higher frame rate help? 
It provides a lot more data and hence the calculation of the predicted path of the ball is more accurate. “The increased frame rate has allowed the accuracy of the prediction to tighten up significantly,” an official privy to Wednesday’s presentation said. “It means between the ball pitching and the ball hitting the pad there is more information available to go into building a prediction. That was something reinforced by the recent testing of the accuracy of a prediction, when compared to the accuracy of a ball that has not been intercepted.”Why did the BCCI have an issue with the location of the point of impact?
When judging the point where the ball hits the pad, a key factor is to make sure the ball has not changed path. The BCCI had said there was potential for operator error while identifying the point of impact.How was that issue solved?
Hawk-Eye created Ultra Edge to remove that problem. Ultra Edge is a sound based, edge-detection system can identify the point of impact more accurately. When there is a sound of ball hitting pad or bat, it can identify the frame in which the ball hits the pad.What if the operator misses the ball? How will they locate point of impact?
Hawk-Eye has added another safeguard to its system: data from every delivery is recorded and can be retrieved in case it’s needed to build a predicted path of the delivery.

The everlasting airport SIM-card machine blues

Our correspondent struggles with technology in New Zealand, then with the lack of it, and ponders the lax application of ecologically sound policies

Andrew Fidel Fernando01-Dec-2016November 14
I arrive in Auckland in the afternoon and clear immigration and customs, but before I can set foot outside, I go through the now-standard procedure of being robbed at the airport. I blame mobile-phone companies.There used to be specialised SIM card booths in many airports, with cheerful staff who would set up your phone with the exact plan you required, while self-sacrificially listening your complaints about the flight. Increasingly, these outlets are disappearing. Now you are made to personally navigate a system in which the customer is set up to fail.This time I buy myself a SIM and NZ$20 worth of credit with a view to getting a $19 plan, but as soon as I load the credit into the phone, all my emails and messages come through in a torrent. When I try to buy the plan – maybe 30 seconds later – I am told I have already spent too much. I am forced to spend another $20 on credit (the minimum amount), and have effectively forked out $40 for $19 of value.I guess you could argue that I should have turned off my mobile data before loading the credit. But look, I am not arguing that I am not a doofus. The point is that the mobile companies intentionally prey on doofuses such as myself and, I think we can all agree, this makes them terrible people.November 15

Next morning, back at the airport, I am reminded of how charmingly intimate and considerate a country New Zealand is. As I await my flight to Christchurch, a Ms Schultz is summoned to her boarding gate no fewer than four times. The last of these announcements ends with: “…the other passengers have boarded and are waiting for you”. You can almost imagine the whole plane staring expectantly at the door, then breaking out in huge cheers and high fives when she strides in triumphantly.A little later, the announcer suggests – in the politest tone – that a mother who has misplaced a young daughter please pick her up from the check-in counter. Off to the left, two airline staff are joyfully posing for selfies with tourists, even though these are the kind of people who, as a rule, are unsatisfied with the first two dozen versions of any photograph.Then, just as I am about to board, a Mr Barry is helpfully told over the speaker system that he is walking around with his fly undone.Okay, that last one didn’t happen, but I’m certain that, at some point, it must have.November 16
A violent earthquake hit North Canterbury in the days before I arrived. Although Christchurch has been spared this time, people in towns further north have been cut off by landslides, and damage to roads. On the radio, the presenter is sympathetically interviewing one of the victims, whose tiny town lies between two of the larger landslides. “Are your family okay?” she asks him. “How worried are you about aftershocks?” “Has there been damage to your house?” He gives five-word answers to each of these, but is more effusive when she asks how he is doing for supplies. “Aww, well, we haven’t been able ta get to the shops since bloody Thursday, aye? We’re runnin’ outta beer and wine, so I’d say that’s definitely a concern.”November 17
The Hagley Oval press area is not a box or room – it is a tent perched halfway up a grass bank. It’s a wonderful place from which to cover a match when it’s sunny, but a challenge when it’s cold. On this rained-out first day of the series, an icy southerly rattles the metal framework and whips up the plastic sheets around us.A lot is made of the courage and commitment of cricketers, who put their bodies on the line for their craft; who live with discipline, and pursue dreams with unwavering will. I, for one, think cricket writers are no less worthy of adulation. My fingers have become numb by afternoon but nevertheless I gather up my resolve and heroically pass on weather updates to my colleagues on ball-by-ball commentary. Steadfastly do I remain in this battered press tent all day, though the carrot cake we are served for tea is slightly drier than is ideal.Hagley Oval: where the grass is green and the fingers freezing•Andrew Fernando/ESPNcricinfo LtdNovember 19

The hotel I am staying at has one of those signs encouraging patrons to reuse towels in order to reduce the hotel’s impact on the environment. The idea that hotels care about the earth is, of course, complete crap – they merely want to cut down on bills. Many hotels would set fire to polar bear cubs if it turned them a profit. Still, I don’t mind reusing towels, so I put mine back on the rack every day, only to find upon my return that that all towels have been replaced, in contravention of their own policy. Not only that, even the barely used shampoo bottles and soaps have been thrown out, and new ones put in their place. One morning I break open a tissue box and use just one sheet, then find a brand new box on the table when I return. I begin to wonder if I was actually sleeping in the same bed every day, or if these people were throwing it out daily and putting a brand-new one in its place.November 20

Sri Lankan friends in Christchurch kindly have me over to dinner, and I feast enthusiastically on and a dark chicken curry. They are fairly recent immigrants to New Zealand and are still figuring out the lay of their new land.”Since coming here, we have learned to say ‘yes’ straight away when visiting people’s houses,” they tell me.”What do you mean?” I ask.”Well, in Sri Lanka, when you are a guest, it’s polite to refuse the first offer of a meal or a cup of tea. Only when they insist are you supposed to agree.””Sure, and here?””Here, if you say no, that’s it. They won’t offer you again. If you refuse it, you don’t get to bloody eat.”November 22

New Zealand is almost too good to be a real country. It has its issues, of course, but there are no major ethnic tensions (not in comparison to most countries, at least) and no obvious signs of public unrest. It has a stable and trusted government (again, by global standards), and its national icon is a fittingly inoffensive animal. Sometimes it’s so perfect, it’s infuriating. This is my third trip around the country in as many years, and the breathtaking scenery keeps rolling by without relent. I am flying over north Canterbury – not an area especially reputed for its beauty – yet here lie these annoyingly gorgeous mountain ridges, all ruggedly serrated, while below, smug cords of captivating blue water wrap around the hills like ribbons on a present. The Pacific Ocean glints obnoxiously in the distance.It just doesn’t seem fair.November 23

Over the past two decades it has become very cool to hate on Hamilton. Coffee-shop hipsters in Wellington will talk about how chlamydia is an airborne disease there, and how the Waikato river brings farming effluent through the middle of town (not true). Comedians will poke fun at Hamiltonians on TV, and Aucklanders heading south will say they take detours just to avoid going near the city.I come to Hamilton hoping to rise above all this snarky criticism, intent on seeing it with fresh eyes. Perhaps I would discover something truly wonderful and unique, I think. But when I arrive, I learn there is no Uber in the city, nor any other ride-hailing system. Cabs are not common, and locals tell me not to bother with public transport. Even backward Sri Lankan towns have this. Instead of tracking the cab on my phone like a reasonable person, I have to stand on a street corner waiting for it for ages, like some kind of Neanderthal.Sometimes, Hamilton, you do have to help yourself.(For any Hamilton residents reading this – my hometown is Dehiwala, and if you want to rip it apart in the comments, I guess that is only fair.)When waiting for a cab in Hamilton, you might as well make yourself comfortable•Getty ImagesNovember 27

Mohammad Amir comes to the post-play press conference – quite unexpectedly, as most journalists thought he was still off limits since his return from suspension. He understands our English but is more comfortable answering in Urdu, and he chuckles when asked about all the catches that have been dropped off his bowling.All the journalists behave themselves. No spiky questions about his suspension are asked. When he leaves, the Kiwi journalists don’t miss the chance to malign their Australian counterparts, who, it is thought, will give Amir a very different reception.”Wait till Pakistan get over there,” says one reporter. “They’ll get some different questions there.””Aww maayte,” says another in a mock Aussie accent, imitating a journalist’s question. “Do you really theenk you deserve to be hee after what you’ve done?”November 29

The first Test I ever covered was in Hamilton, in 2009. I stayed too long in the press box one evening and managed to get myself locked in the stadium. I had to climb over a fence to get out, and in the process, dropped and damaged my laptop.I realise now, that it had been a training run for this Test, when again, I stay too long and get myself locked in. This time, with a much more expensive laptop, I climb the same fence, but carefully avoid the old mistake – dropping gingerly down onto the pavement, to go wait on the corner for my taxi for what seems like an hour.

'It was very lonely here' – Sehwag

In his third innings, Karun Nair became the second Indian to score a Test triple-hundred. Here’s how Twitter reacted

ESPNcricinfo staff19-Dec-2016The only India batsman to have scored a triple-hundred before Karun Nair was Virender Sehwag. He was among the first to welcome Nair to the club.

Wishes poured in from across India.

And elsewhere.

Karun Nair’s highest first-class score still remains his 328 in the 2014-15 Ranji Trophy final.

India declared on 759 for 7 – their record Test total – and Nair’s unbeaten 303 was the first time a batsman had finished on that score in Tests.

Both Jayant Yadav and Karun Nair, who were handed debuts during the England series, have made an impression.

The 31st Test triple soon?

Would you agree with this thought?

That would be cruel.

The mysterious mobile phone at Newlands

Upul Tharanga’s double delight, Faf du Plessis’ sprinkling of luck and a mysterious mobile phone feature in the plays of the day from the fourth ODI in Cape Town

Firdose Moonda07-Feb-2017The one that stuckSri Lanka have struggled to take their chances throughout this tour, but clung on to one of the few they got this time. Quinton de Kock looked in imperious form and was on 55 when he walked out to meet a Sachitra Pathirana delivery. But the ball dipped on him and took the edge that flew to the left of stand-in captain Upul Tharanga, who dived to his left at slip and held on with both hands. De Kock’s excellent record of converting fifties to hundreds was dented but it needed some proper commitment to ensure he did not bat on.Dig this out Faf du Plessis had barely received a challenging ball on his way to his second century in the series, until he was on 98. Lahiru Kumara, whose first four overs cost 32 runs, sent down a toe-crusher on leg stump that would have uprooted it, but du Plessis had luck on his side. Not only did he get the bat down in time, but he dug the ball out with such force that it raced to fine leg for four. He fell over in the process but found his feet and raised his arms in time to celebrate his milestone.Cricket Calling South African grounds have provided entertainment other than what’s happening on-field to create incentives for more people to come and watch. There’s been everything from cook-offs to fancy dress to a bee invasion and today, there was a mobile phone. In the 36th over of the South African innings, a cellphone found its way onto the outfield. Who put it there? And who were they trying to call? Perhaps only Sri Lanka’s 12th man will know. He passed the phone to a man in the crowd – but was it really his?Going for the record After timing the ball magnificently for two-and-a-half hours, Faf du Plessis found himself a shot away from history… and mishit. He was aiming to clear the long-on boundary off the second ball of the final over but did not get enough power behind the shot. Although the fielder had to make some ground, he took the catch. In hindsight, du Plessis may have been better off hitting the ball along the ground, where it may still have found the rope and seen him overtake Gary Kirsten’s record for the highest score by a South African in ODIs.Double delightUpul Tharanga’s clean-hitting made for as eye-catching a contest as anyone would have hoped for but there was one shot that was memorable not just because it was meatily struck. The 73rd ball Tharanga faced was effortlessly lofted over long-on and brought up two much-needed milestones for Sri Lanka. It took their total to 190 – their highest in the ODI series thus far – and gave them their first centurion in any format on this tour.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus